↓ Skip to main content

Roles of the Two Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Structural Domains in Circadian Photoreception

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Roles of the Two Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Structural Domains in Circadian Photoreception
Published in
Science, June 2004
DOI 10.1126/science.1096973
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) is the primary circadian photoreceptor in Drosophila. We show that CRY binding to TIMELESS (TIM) is light-dependent in flies and irreversibly commits TIM to proteasomal degradation. In contrast, CRY degradation is dependent on continuous light exposure, indicating that the CRY-TIM interaction is transient. A novel cry mutation (cry(m)) reveals that CRY's photolyase homology domain is sufficient for light detection and phototransduction, whereas the carboxyl-terminal domain regulates CRY stability, CRY-TIM interaction, and circadian photosensitivity. This contrasts with the function of Arabidopsis CRY domains and demonstrates that insect and plant cryptochromes use different mechanisms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
China 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 206 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 23%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Master 21 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 10%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 21%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Chemistry 14 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 35 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,042,246
of 23,410,748 outputs
Outputs from Science
#32,683
of 78,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,924
of 58,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#86
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,410,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.