↓ Skip to main content

Intrinsic or extrinsic population growth in Iron Age northeast Thailand? The evidence from isotopic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Science, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intrinsic or extrinsic population growth in Iron Age northeast Thailand? The evidence from isotopic analysis
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Science, March 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.018
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Philippines 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 15 31%
Social Sciences 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#1,432
of 3,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,804
of 127,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.