↓ Skip to main content

Multispectral Phloem-Mobile Probes: Properties and Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Physiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multispectral Phloem-Mobile Probes: Properties and Applications
Published in
Plant Physiology, February 2015
DOI 10.1104/pp.114.255414
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Using Arabidopsis seedlings, we identified a range of small fluorescent probes that entered the translocation stream and were unloaded at the root tip. These probes had absorbance/emission maxima ranging from 367/454 nm to 546/576 nm and represent a versatile toolbox for studying phloem transport. Of the probes we tested, naturally occurring fluorescent coumarin glucosides (esculin, fraxin) were phloem loaded, and were transported in oocytes by the sucrose transporter, AtSUC2. Arabidopsis plants in which AtSUC2 was replaced with barley sucrose transporter HvSUT1, which does not transport esculin, failed to load esculin into the phloem. In wild-type plants the fluorescence of esculin decayed to background levels after about 2h following phloem unloading, making it a suitable tracer for pulse-labelling studies of phloem transport. We identified additional probes, such as carboxytetraethylrhodamine; CTER) a red fluorescent probe that, unlike esculin, was stable for several hours following phloem unloading and could be used to study phloem transport in Arabidopsis lines expressing GFP.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 16%
Chemistry 6 3%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,640,567
of 30,720,210 outputs
Outputs from Plant Physiology
#3,769
of 14,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,154
of 383,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Physiology
#18
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,720,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.