↓ Skip to main content

Break-Induced Replication and Recombinational Telomere Elongation in Yeast

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Biochemistry, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Break-Induced Replication and Recombinational Telomere Elongation in Yeast
Published in
Annual Review of Biochemistry, June 2006
DOI 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133234
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When a telomere becomes unprotected or if only one end of a chromosomal double-strand break succeeds in recombining with a template sequence, DNA can be repaired by a recombination-dependent DNA replication process termed break-induced replication (BIR). In budding yeasts, there are two BIR pathways, one dependent on the Rad51 recombinase protein and one Rad51 independent; these two repair processes lead to different types of survivors in cells lacking the telomerase enzyme that is required for normal telomere maintenance. Recombination at telomeres is triggered by either excessive telomere shortening or disruptions in the function of telomere-binding proteins. Telomere elongation by BIR appears to often occur through a "roll and spread" mechanism. In this process, a telomeric circle produced by recombination at a dysfunctional telomere acts as a template for a rolling circle BIR event to form an elongated telomere. Additional BIR events can then copy the elongated sequence to all other telomeres.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
France 4 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Bulgaria 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 233 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 25%
Researcher 60 24%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 37 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,503,433
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Biochemistry
#298
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,450
of 127,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Biochemistry
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.