↓ Skip to main content

Isotachophoresis of proteins in a networked microfluidic chip: Experiment and 2‐D simulation

Overview of attention for article published in Electrophoresis, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Isotachophoresis of proteins in a networked microfluidic chip: Experiment and 2‐D simulation
Published in
Electrophoresis, March 2007
DOI 10.1002/elps.200600525
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper reports both the experimental application and 2-D simulation of ITP of proteins in a networked microfluidic chip. Experiments demonstrate that a mixture of three fluorescent proteins can be concentrated and stacked into adjacent zones of pure protein under a constant voltage of 100 V over a 2 cm long microchannel. Measurements of the isotachophoretic velocity of the moving zones demonstrates that, during ITP under a constant voltage, the zone velocity decreases as more of the channel is occupied by the terminating electrolyte. A 2-D ITP model based on the Nernst-Planck equations illustrates the stacking and separation features of ITP using simulations of three virtual proteins. The self-sharpening behavior of ITP zones dispersed by a T-junction is clearly demonstrated both by experiment and by simulation. Comparison of 2-D simulations of ITP and zone electrophoresis (ZE) confirms that ZE lacks the ability to resharpen protein zones after they pass through a T-junction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 5%
United States 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
Hungary 1 3%
Unknown 33 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Chemistry 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Materials Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Electrophoresis
#1,827
of 5,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,729
of 131,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electrophoresis
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.