↓ Skip to main content

What Is Inhibited in Inhibition of Return?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Is Inhibited in Inhibition of Return?
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, January 1996
DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz, Amishi P. Jha, James Neils Rosenquist

Abstract

Research on temporal-order judgments, reference frames, discrimination tasks, and links to oculomotor control suggest important differences between inhibition of return (IOR) and attentional costs and benefits. Yet, it is generally assumed that IOR is an attentional effect even though there is little supporting evidence. The authors evaluated this assumption by examining how several factors that are known to influence attentional costs and benefits affect the magnitude of IOR: target modality, target intensity, and response mode. Results similar to those previously reported for attention were observed: IOR was greater for visual than for auditory targets, showed an inverse relationship with target intensity, and was equivalent for manual and saccadic responses. Important parallels between IOR and attentional costs and benefits are indicated, suggesting that, like attention, IOR may in part affect sensory-perceptual processes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 56 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#10,712,029
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance
#380
of 3,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,261
of 116,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.