↓ Skip to main content

The long history of health inequality in New Zealand: occupational class and lifespan in the late 1800s and early 1900s

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The long history of health inequality in New Zealand: occupational class and lifespan in the late 1800s and early 1900s
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, February 2018
DOI 10.1111/1753-6405.12765
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As relatively little is known about how socioeconomic position might have affected health prior to the Second World War, we aimed to study lifespan by occupational class in two cohorts in New Zealand. The first study included men on the electoral rolls in Dunedin in the period 1893 to 1902. The second study used an established cohort of male military personnel who were recruited for the First World War. Linear regression was used to estimate lifespan by occupational class. The first study of 259 men on the electoral rolls found no substantive lifespan differences between the high and low occupational class groups. But the second study of 2,406 military personnel found that men in the three highest occupational classes lived 3.5 years longer (95%CI: 0.3-6.8 years) than the three lowest classes (in the multivariable analysis adjusting for age in 1918 and rurality of occupation). We found no significant lifespan differences in one cohort, but a second cohort is the earliest demonstration to our knowledge of substantial differences in mortality by socioeconomic position in this country prior to the 1960s. Implications for public health: This study provides historical context to the long-term efforts to address health inequalities in society.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,084,078
of 28,809,062 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#199
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,440
of 466,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,809,062 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.