↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Accident and Emergency Doctors' Responses to Treating People Who Self-Harm

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Health Research, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of Accident and Emergency Doctors' Responses to Treating People Who Self-Harm
Published in
Qualitative Health Research, May 2009
DOI 10.1177/1049732309334473
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Self-harm is a prevalent phenomenon regularly faced by doctors and nurses working in accident and emergency (A&E) departments. We argue that the treatment decisions A&E doctors make are fundamental to decreasing the high risk of suicide among this group. In this article we present a qualitative study exploring how doctors working in A&E respond to treating people who self-harm. In total, five A&E doctors were interviewed and the data were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Three main themes were extracted: treating the body, silencing the self, and mirroring cultural and societal responses to self-harm. Within these themes, we identified both facilitative and unhelpful aspects of the relationships between people who self-harm and A&E doctors. We consider the clinical implications of these findings within the context of A&E doctors having limited opportunities to address the relational nature of the care they offer to this group.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 32%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,746,823
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Health Research
#696
of 1,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,483
of 103,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Health Research
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.