↓ Skip to main content

Relaxed impact craters on Ganymede: Regional variation and high heat flows

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relaxed impact craters on Ganymede: Regional variation and high heat flows
Published in
ICARUS, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.01.012
Authors

Kelsi N. Singer, Michael T. Bland, Paul M. Schenk, William B. McKinnon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 50%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#4,911
of 5,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,938
of 339,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#53
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.