↓ Skip to main content

カーリングのストーンが曲がるメカニズム -シンプルな左右説の提案-

Overview of attention for article published in Summaries of JSSI and JSSE Joint Conference on Snow and Ice Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
カーリングのストーンが曲がるメカニズム -シンプルな左右説の提案-
Published in
Summaries of JSSI and JSSE Joint Conference on Snow and Ice Research, December 2017
DOI 10.14851/jcsir.2017.0_140
Authors

亀田 貴雄, 佐渡 公明, 鹿野 大貴

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,749,194
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Summaries of JSSI and JSSE Joint Conference on Snow and Ice Research
#17
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,291
of 444,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Summaries of JSSI and JSSE Joint Conference on Snow and Ice Research
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.