↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol consumption and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a cohort of older women

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Alcohol consumption and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a cohort of older women
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, June 1999
DOI 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690547
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We investigated the relation of alcohol consumption to risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in a cohort of 35 156 Iowa women aged 55-69 years who participated in the Iowa Women's Health Study in 1986. Alcohol consumption at baseline was obtained using a mailed questionnaire. During the 9-year follow-up period, 143 incident cases of NHL were identified. Higher alcohol consumption was significantly associated with a decreased risk of NHL (P-trend = 0.03). Compared to non-drinkers, multivariate-adjusted relative risks (RRs) were decreased for women with intake of < or = 3.4 g day(-1) (RR = 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.21) and > 3.4 g day(-1) (RR = 0.59; 0.36-0.97). The inverse association could not be attributed to one particular type of alcoholic beverage, although red wine (RR = 0.21 for > 2 glasses per month vs non-drinker; 0.05-0.86; P-trend = 0.02) has the most distinct effect. The apparent protective effect was universal regardless of specific NHL grade or Working Formulation subtype, but was most pronounced for nodal NHL (RR = 0.48; 0.26-0.90; P-trend = 0.01) and low-grade NHL (RR = 0.52; 0.21-1.26; P-trend = 0.05). These data suggest that moderate alcohol consumption is inversely associated with the risk of NHL in older women and the amount of alcohol consumed, rather than the type of alcoholic beverages, appears to be the main effect determinant.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Other 3 19%
Professor 3 19%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,425,026
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#4,887
of 10,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,827
of 35,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#19
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.