↓ Skip to main content

Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
101 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
1200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective
Published in
Nature, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/nature25770
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This review summarizes the case for investing in adolescence as a period of rapid growth, learning, adaptation, and formational neurobiological development. Adolescence is a dynamic maturational period during which young lives can pivot rapidly-in both negative and positive directions. Scientific progress in understanding adolescent development provides actionable insights into windows of opportunity during which policies can have a positive impact on developmental trajectories relating to health, education, and social and economic success. Given current global changes and challenges that affect adolescents, there is a compelling need to leverage these advances in developmental science to inform strategic investments in adolescent health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 146 12%
Student > Master 112 9%
Researcher 111 9%
Student > Bachelor 82 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 74 6%
Other 147 12%
Unknown 528 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 224 19%
Social Sciences 79 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 5%
Neuroscience 64 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 3%
Other 148 12%
Unknown 582 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2026.
All research outputs
#265,723
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,011
of 117,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,888
of 373,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#269
of 916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.