↓ Skip to main content

Difficulty Achieving Vitamin D Sufficiency With High‐Dose Oral Repletion Therapy in Infants With Cholestasis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Difficulty Achieving Vitamin D Sufficiency With High‐Dose Oral Repletion Therapy in Infants With Cholestasis
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, August 2015
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000000751
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Oral high dose repletion vitamin D therapy, also known as stoss therapy, can be effective in the treatment of nutritional vitamin D-deficiency rickets in infants and young children without liver disease and in patients with cystic fibrosis. There is no literature about this approach in infants with new onset cholestasis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#11,376,141
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#3,312
of 7,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,904
of 300,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#37
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.