↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Use of a Patient-Specific Outcome Measure and a Movement Classification System to Guide Nonsurgical Management of a Circus Performer with Low Back Pain
Published in
Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, December 2017
DOI 10.12678/1089-313x.21.4.185
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) can be detrimental to the career of a circus arts performer, yet there is minimal population-specific literature to guide care. Moreover, reluctance to discontinue training and the need to resume end-range lumbar motion can impede the success of conservative care. The purpose of this case report is to describe the use of a patient-specific outcome measure and a movement classification system to structure a home exercise program (HEP) for an adolescent training to be a circus performer. The patient was a 16-year-old female with a 10-month history of LBP. A Movement System Impairment examination indicated that she had lower abdominal weakness, gluteal weakness, and hip flexors that were short and stiff; hence, extension and rotation were repeated patterns of lumbopelvic movement associated with her LBP symptoms. The patient was seen for 16 visits over 16 weeks. The HEP focused on minimizing lumbopelvic extension and rotation movements while improving abdominal and gluteal strength and hip flexor flexibility. Resumption of acrobatic activities was guided by the Patient-Specific Functional Scale. As measured by this scale, her difficulty with five functional and acrobatic activities decreased from 4/10 at initial evaluation to less than or equal to 1/10 by discharge. It is concluded that using an outcome measure to assess difficulty of activities chosen by the patient and education on how to avoid movement patterns associated with LBP symptoms can help facilitate return to performance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 30 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 33 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dance Medicine & Science
#263
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#437,294
of 491,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dance Medicine & Science
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.