↓ Skip to main content

Protein-protein interactions in eukaryotic transcription initiation: structure of the preinitiation complex.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Protein-protein interactions in eukaryotic transcription initiation: structure of the preinitiation complex.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 1996
DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1119
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have used alanine scanning to analyze protein-protein interactions by human TATA-element binding protein (TBP) within the transcription preinitiation complex. The results indicate that TBP interacts with RNA polymerase II and general transcription factors IIA, IIB, and IIF within the functional transcription preinitiation complex and define the determinants of TBP for each of these interactions. The results permit construction of a model for the structure of the preinitiation complex.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Czechia 3 5%
Turkey 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Researcher 15 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 19%
Chemistry 6 10%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2026.
All research outputs
#5,140,923
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#48,571
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,366
of 117,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#84
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.