↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Management of the Dandy-Walker Malformation: 30 Years of Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Neurosurgery, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diagnosis and Management of the Dandy-Walker Malformation: 30 Years of Experience
Published in
Pediatric Neurosurgery, March 2008
DOI 10.1159/000120660
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Thirty-seven patients with Dandy-Walker malformation were treated between 1959 and 1989. Eighty percent of patients became symptomatic by 3 years of age, with 70% presenting within the 1st year of life. Hydrocephalus was present in 91% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Clinical presentation was most often heralded by symptoms and signs of hydrocephalus with focal neurological findings being a less prominent feature. One third of children demonstrated developmental delay. Associated congenital anomalies were present in 48% of children. Contemporary neuroimaging including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging facilitated diagnosis obviating the need for invasive studies such as pneumoencephalography and ventriculography. Patients were initially managed by posterior fossa craniectomy with membrane excision (8), lateral ventricle shunt alone (13), shunting of the cyst alone (4), or combined shunting of the cyst and lateral ventricles (12). Combined shunting proved superior to the other methods, being successful in alleviating hydrocephalus and posterior fossa symptoms in 92% cases. The overall mortality was 24%, the majority occurring before 1970. Of the 28 survivors, 27 (96%) are shunt-dependent, with 19 having a combined shunt system in place. Therefore, we currently favor combined shunting of the cyst and lateral ventricles as the initial procedure for patients with Dandy-Walker malformation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 48%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Neurosurgery
#61
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,385
of 79,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Neurosurgery
#6
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.