You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
日本手話学会第24回大会基調講演「アイヌ語辞書編纂とアイヌ」
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies, January 1999
|
| DOI | 10.7877/jasl.15.43 |
| Authors |
菅野 茂 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 25% |
| Unknown | 18 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 96% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,961,498
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies
#2
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,205
of 110,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Sign Language Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them