↓ Skip to main content

PERCUTANEOUS AFFERENT NEUROMODULATION FOR THE REFRACTORY OVERACTIVE BLADDER: RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
24 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
PERCUTANEOUS AFFERENT NEUROMODULATION FOR THE REFRACTORY OVERACTIVE BLADDER: RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY
Published in
The Journal of Urology, April 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66469-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

More than 20 million Americans have an overactive bladder, the predominant symptoms being frequency, urgency, urge incontinence and pelvic pain. While the etiology is not completely understood, most investigators believe the causes to be many and the pelvic floor to be intimately related. Whatever the etiology, traditional therapies, including dietary manipulation, bladder drill, medications and physical therapy, are often poorly tolerated and/or ineffective. We report a prospective, multicenter clinical trial that was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous peripheral afferent nerve stimulation for treatment of refractive overactive bladder and/or pelvic floor dysfunction. A total of 53 patients with overactive bladders, in whom all traditional therapy failed, were enrolled in 1 of 5 sites within the United States. Patients received weekly percutaneous electrical stimulations via a 34 gauge needle placed near the tibial nerve 3 finger breadths above the ankle. Urodynamic studies, detailed voiding diaries, quality of life surveys, and incontinence impact questionnaires were completed before, during and after the study. Of the patients with a mean age of 57.4 years 89% (47 of 53) completed the 12-week study. A total of 71% of patients were classified as treatment successes by the investigators and were started on long-term treatment. On average patients noticed a 25% reduction in mean daytime and 21% reduction in mean nighttime voiding frequencies (p <0.05). Urge incontinence was reduced by an average of 35% (p <0.05). Statistically significant improvements were noted in selective pain and quality of life indexes. No significant adverse events related to treatment were noted in any patients. Percutaneous peripheral afferent nerve stimulation offers a safe, minimally invasive and effective treatment for managing refractive overactive bladder and/or pelvic floor dysfunction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 99 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 43%
Engineering 12 11%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#4,481,048
of 29,688,655 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#2,990
of 20,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,568
of 51,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#8
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,688,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.