↓ Skip to main content

An association of smoking with serum urate and gout: A health paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An association of smoking with serum urate and gout: A health paradox
Published in
Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.11.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The potential effect of cigarette smoking on levels of serum urate and risk of gout has been considered by a large number of studies, either as the primary variable of interest or as a covariate. Here we systematically review the published evidence relating to the relationship of smoking with serum urate, hyperuricaemia, and gout. Many studies have reported that smoking reduces serum urate, however, the evidence has not been conclusive with other studies pointing to the opposite or no effect. It has also been suggested that smoking reduces the risk of gout, although there is some evidence to contradict this finding. A consensus has yet to be reached as to the effect of smoking on serum urate levels and the risk of gout.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 23 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#27,764,246
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#1,962
of 2,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,301
of 492,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#30
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.