↓ Skip to main content

The nature of learned categorical perception effects: a psychophysical approach

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The nature of learned categorical perception effects: a psychophysical approach
Published in
Cognition, March 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Categorical perception is often cited as a striking example of cognitive influences on perception. However, some evidence suggests the term is a misnomer, with effects based on cognitive not perceptual processing. Here, using a psychophysical approach, we provide evidence consistent with a learned categorical perception effect that is dependent on analysis within the visual processing stream. An improvement in participants' discrimination between grating patterns that they had learned to place in different categories was 'tuned' around the orientation of the patterns experienced during category learning. Thus, here, categorical perception may result from attentionally modulated perceptual learning about diagnostic category features, based upon orientation-selective stages of analysis. This argues strongly that category learning can alter our perception of the world.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 102 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 29%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Professor 12 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 58%
Linguistics 10 8%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Philosophy 4 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2012.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#1,993
of 3,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,967
of 84,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.