↓ Skip to main content

The neural correlates of temperamental inhibitory control in toddlers

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The neural correlates of temperamental inhibitory control in toddlers
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2018
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2017.0160
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current study examined the association between effortful control and a well-studied neural index of self-regulation, the N2 event-related potential (ERP) component, in toddlers. Participants included 107 toddlers (44 girls) assessed at 30, 36 and 42 months of age. Participants completed a Go/NoGo task while electroencephalography data were recorded. The study focused on the N2 ERP component. Parent-reported effortful control was examined in association with the NoGo N2 ERP component. Findings suggest a positive association between the NoGo N2 component and the inhibitory control subscale of the wider effortful control dimension, suggesting that the N2 component may index processes associated with temperamental effortful control.This article is part of the theme issue 'Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences'.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,691,883
of 27,394,475 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5,873
of 7,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,778
of 348,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#92
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,394,475 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.