↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Genes of Mitochondrial Origin in the Genus Entamoeba

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of Genes of Mitochondrial Origin in the Genus Entamoeba
Published in
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, July 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00119.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The amitochondriate protistan parasite Entamoeba histolytica has lost most mitochondrial functions secondarily but has retained a reduced organelle of mitochondrial origin, the mitosome. We here investigate the presence, origins, and expression in other species of Entamoeba of three genes of mitochondrial origin--pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase and the mitochondrial-type chaperonins cpn60 and hsp70. The genes appear to be present in all species and specifically related, confirming that the E. histolytica mitosomal genes were not acquired recently by lateral transfer from another organism. Detection of expression was not possible in all cases under the culture conditions used, but several genes were induced during recovery from exposure to a heat shock. This includes the transhydrogenase, which to our knowledge has not been shown previously to be a heat-shock protein.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 4 27%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2026.
All research outputs
#8,180,299
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#347
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,969
of 61,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.