Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is a non-invasive, painless technique for the evaluation of neuromuscular disease, and here we evaluate its potential application in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Twenty-one SMA patients and 18 healthy children underwent EIM of biceps brachii and tibialis anterior using a commercially available impedance device. Hand-held dynamometry and ultrasound assessment of subcutaneous fat thickness were also performed. All EIM parameters differed significantly between both SMA patients and normal subjects and between type 2 and type 3 SMA patients. In addition, EIM had an accuracy level as high as 93% for correctly categorizing patients as type 2 or type 3. Multiple regression analyses confirmed a strong association between EIM and dynamometry. These results confirm that EIM can accurately categorize patients with SMA. Because EIM requires no patient effort and is rapid to apply, it may serve a useful role in future SMA clinical trials.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,074,702
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Muscle & Nerve
#511
of 3,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,660
of 250,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Muscle & Nerve
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
