↓ Skip to main content

Risk Assessment of Isolated Single-Wall Orbit Fractures and Eye Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk Assessment of Isolated Single-Wall Orbit Fractures and Eye Injury
Published in
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, June 2018
DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000004412
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ideally, all patients with isolated orbit fracture would undergo ophthalmologic evaluation before surgical intervention to rule out concomitant globe injury and possible vision loss. Unfortunately, not all institutions are capable of providing the evaluation before surgery. The authors hypothesize that the anatomic location of a single-wall orbit isolated orbit fracture can help predict the likelihood of ocular injury and thus identify high-risk patients who mandate ophthalmologic evaluation before surgical repair. A retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary academic medical center using the institutional trauma registry for maxillofacial trauma. All subjects with an isolated single-wall orbit fracture were included in this study. Statistical analysis was performed using a Fisher exact test. Two hundred seventy-nine subjects with orbit fractures were identified for inclusion in this study. Forty-one of the 279 (14.7%) subjects had isolated single-wall orbit fractures. Isolated single-wall fractures included orbit floor = 19 of 41 (46.3%), medial wall = 15 of 41 (36.6%), lateral wall = 4 of 41 (9.8%), and orbit roof = 3 of 41 (7.3%). Concomitant ocular injury (13 of 41, 31.8%) was associated with isolated orbit wall fractures as follows: orbit floor = 4 of 19 (21.1%), medial wall = 6 of 15 (40%), lateral wall = 2 of 4 (50%), and orbit roof = 1 of 3 (33.3%). A Fisher exact test demonstrated that there was no statistically significant association between individual isolated wall fractures and ocular injury (P = 0.5000). Isolated orbit wall fractures are common in maxillofacial trauma and often require surgical repair. Concomitant ocular injury is common (31.8%) with this highest incidence occurring with lateral wall fractures (50%); however, statistical analysis did not demonstrate a significant relationship between the anatomic location of an isolated single-wall fracture and eye injuries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#21,801,223
of 24,325,299 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
#1,835
of 4,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,731
of 334,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
#55
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,325,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.