↓ Skip to main content

Revamping Mosquito-borne Disease Control to Tackle Future Threats

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Parasitology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Revamping Mosquito-borne Disease Control to Tackle Future Threats
Published in
Trends in Parasitology, February 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.pt.2018.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The global approach to mosquito-borne diseases (MBDs) is in need of critical re-evaluation. Although there have been dramatic reductions in malaria incidence since 2000, malaria elimination from high-transmission settings remains problematic. At the same time, arbovirus outbreaks have increased in their frequency and impact. The 2015-2016 Zika virus epidemic exposed the dire state of MBD control in many countries, calling for united global action. Despite international resolve to prevent future epidemics, current practices in MBD control are mostly reactive and of limited efficacy. In this Opinion article, we summarize the views of 25 international mosquito experts about the current state of MBD control and highlight the issues that must be addressed in order to tackle emerging threats on the horizon.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 66 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 74 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,977,734
of 27,957,894 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Parasitology
#817
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,455
of 348,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Parasitology
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,957,894 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.