↓ Skip to main content

Sterically Induced Ligand Framework Distortion Effects on Catalytic Cyclic Ester Polymerizations

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sterically Induced Ligand Framework Distortion Effects on Catalytic Cyclic Ester Polymerizations
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, February 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00250
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Aluminum alkoxide complexes supported by salen ligands [salen = N,N'-bis(salicylaldimine)-2-methylpropane-1,2-diamine or N,N'-bis(salicylaldimine)-2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine] with o-adamantyl substituents have been synthesized and investigated for the polymerization of ε-caprolactone. Geometric analysis of the catalysts used for the reaction reveals the metal coordination geometries to be intermediate between square-pyramidal and trigonal-bipyramidal. A detailed kinetic study accompanied by density functional theory modeling of key mechanistic steps of the reaction suggest that, in addition to the length of the backbone linker, the o-aryl substituents have a significant impact on the catalyst's reactivity. Bulky ortho substituents favorably distort the precatalyst geometry and thereby foster the achievement of the rate-limiting transition-state geometry at low energetic cost, thus accelerating the reaction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 62%
Computer Science 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,004,228
of 27,735,993 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#4,360
of 25,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,337
of 348,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#59
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,735,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.