↓ Skip to main content

The Doubletime and CKII Kinases Collaborate to Potentiate Drosophila PER Transcriptional Repressor Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Doubletime and CKII Kinases Collaborate to Potentiate Drosophila PER Transcriptional Repressor Activity
Published in
Molecular Cell, January 2004
DOI 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00503-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In all genetically studied model organisms, a negative feedback loop of gene expression contributes to the circadian rhythm mechanism. In the Drosophila system, it has been proposed that the delay between the synthesis and function of clock proteins is due to phosphorylation-regulated nuclear entry. To test this hypothesis, we assayed the relationship between PER phosphorylation, nuclear localization, and transcriptional repression activity in cultured S2 cells. The results indicate that the two putative PER kinases DBT and CKII work together to phosphorylate PER and increase repression activity. Experiments combining kinase inhibition with inhibition of PER nuclear export suggest that phosphorylation directly affects PER repression activity and that PER nuclear localization is an indirect consequence of the association of active PER with DNA or chromatin. This interpretation suggests further that the circadian regulation of PER nuclear localization in flies reflects changes in PER transcriptional activity rather than in PER nuclear import or export activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Chemistry 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2022.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#5,711
of 8,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,764
of 156,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#27
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.