↓ Skip to main content

Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Published in
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, February 2018
DOI 10.1093/ofid/ofy022
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Infections caused byMycobacterium abscessusgroup strains are usually resistant to multiple antimicrobials and challenging to treat worldwide. We describe the risk factors, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients in 2 large academic medical centers in the United States. A retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults with a positive culture forM. abscessusin Miami, Florida (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014). Demographics, comorbidities, the source of infection, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Early treatment failure was defined as death and/or infection relapse characterized either by persistent positive culture forM. abscessuswithin 12 weeks of treatment initiation and/or lack of radiographic improvement. One hundred eight patients were analyzed. The mean age was 50.81 ± 21.03 years, 57 (52.8%) were females, and 41 (38%) Hispanics. Eleven (10.2%) had end-stage renal disease, 34 (31.5%) were on immunosuppressive therapy, and 40% had chronic lung disease. Fifty-nine organisms (54.6%) were isolated in respiratory sources, 21 (19.4%) in blood, 10 (9.2%) skin and soft tissue, and 9 (8.3%) intra-abdominal. Antimicrobial susceptibility reports were available for 64 (59.3%) of the patients. Most of the isolates were susceptible to clarithromycin, amikacin, and tigecycline (93.8%, 93.8%, and 89.1%, respectively). None of the isolates were susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and only 1 (1.6%) was susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Thirty-six (33.3%) patients early failed treatment; of those, 17 (15.7%) died while hospitalized. On multivariate analysis, risk factors significantly associated with early treatment failure were disseminated infection (odds ratio [OR], 11.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-81.69;P= .04), acute kidney injury (OR, 6.55; 95% CI, 2.4-31.25;P= .018), organ transplantation (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.7-23.1;P= .005), immunosuppressive therapy (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.6-21.4;P= .002), intravenous amikacin treatment (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 0.9-21;P= .04), clarithromycin resistance (OR,79.5; 95% CI, 6.2-3717.1,P< .001), and presence of prosthetic device (OR, 5.43; 95% CI, 1.57-18.81;P= .008). Receiving macrolide treatment was found to be protective against early treatment failure (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.002-1.8;P= .04). Our cohort of 108M. abscessuscomplex isolates in Miami, Florida, showed an in-hospital mortality of 15.7%. Most infections were respiratory. Clarithromycin and amikacin were the most likely agents to be susceptible in vitro. Resistance to fluoroquinolone and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was highly common. Macrolide resistance, immunosuppression, and renal disease were significantly associated with early treatment failure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 29 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,869,941
of 33,937,515 outputs
Outputs from Open Forum Infectious Diseases
#865
of 6,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,393
of 494,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Forum Infectious Diseases
#7
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,937,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.