↓ Skip to main content

琵琶湖の渡津をめぐる歴史地理学的管見 : 矢橋の集落形態とその機能について(二月例会報告要旨)

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Review of Transport and Communications, April 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
琵琶湖の渡津をめぐる歴史地理学的管見 : 矢橋の集落形態とその機能について(二月例会報告要旨)
Published in
Historical Review of Transport and Communications, April 1995
DOI 10.20712/kotsushi.35.0_101
Authors

岩間 一水

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Historical Review of Transport and Communications
#43
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,009
of 23,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Review of Transport and Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them