↓ Skip to main content

Kinetic Study of Coniferyl Alcohol Radical Binding to the (+)-Pinoresinol Forming Dirigent Protein †

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Kinetic Study of Coniferyl Alcohol Radical Binding to the (+)-Pinoresinol Forming Dirigent Protein †
Published in
Biochemistry, February 2004
DOI 10.1021/bi035959o
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

An essential step in lignan and lignin formation in planta is one electron oxidation of (E)-coniferyl alcohol (CA) to generate the radical intermediate (CA(*)), which can then undergo directed radical-radical couplings in vivo. For lignan formation in vitro and in vivo, stereoselective coupling of CA(*) only occurs to afford (+)-pinoresinol in the additional presence of (+)-pinoresinol forming dirigent protein (DP). Presented herein is a kinetic and thermodynamic study which reveals the central mechanistic details of the coupling process involved in DP-mediated coupling. DP activity was maximal between pH 4.25 and pH 6.0, with activity being maintained at temperatures below 33 degrees C. Equilibrium binding assays revealed that coniferyl alcohol was only weakly bound to the DP, with a K(D) of 370 +/- 65 microM. On the other hand, the enantiomeric excess of (+)-pinoresinol formed was dependent on both DP concentration and rate of CA oxidation and, thus, on apparent steady-state [CA(*)]. The data obtained could best be explained using a kinetic model where radical-radical coupling via DP competes with that occurring in open solution. Using this model, an apparent K(M) of about 10 nM was estimated from the saturation behavior of (+)-pinoresinol formation with respect to apparent steady-state [CA(*)]. These data strongly suggest that CA(*), rather than CA, is the substrate for DP, in agreement with earlier predictions. A mechanism of directed radical-radical coupling, where two coniferyl alcohol radical substrates are bound per protein dimer, is proposed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 32%
Chemistry 20 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2012.
All research outputs
#8,135,326
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#7,266
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,564
of 138,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#39
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.