↓ Skip to main content

Aip1p Interacts with Cofilin to Disassemble Actin Filaments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Aip1p Interacts with Cofilin to Disassemble Actin Filaments
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, June 1999
DOI 10.1083/jcb.145.6.1251
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Actin interacting protein 1 (Aip1) is a conserved component of the actin cytoskeleton first identified in a two-hybrid screen against yeast actin. Here, we report that Aip1p also interacts with the ubiquitous actin depolymerizing factor cofilin. A two-hybrid-based approach using cofilin and actin mutants identified residues necessary for the interaction of actin, cofilin, and Aip1p in an apparent ternary complex. Deletion of the AIP1 gene is lethal in combination with cofilin mutants or act1-159, an actin mutation that slows the rate of actin filament disassembly in vivo. Aip1p localizes to cortical actin patches in yeast cells, and this localization is disrupted by specific actin and cofilin mutations. Further, Aip1p is required to restrict cofilin localization to cortical patches. Finally, biochemical analyses show that Aip1p causes net depolymerization of actin filaments only in the presence of cofilin and that cofilin enhances binding of Aip1p to actin filaments. We conclude that Aip1p is a cofilin-associated protein that enhances the filament disassembly activity of cofilin and restricts cofilin localization to cortical actin patches.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 27%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 28%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,344,996
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#8,311
of 13,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,592
of 52,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#48
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.