↓ Skip to main content

Myelinoclastic Diffuse Sclerosis (Schilder's Disease): Report of a Case and Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Neurology, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Myelinoclastic Diffuse Sclerosis (Schilder's Disease): Report of a Case and Review of the Literature
Published in
Journal of Child Neurology, October 1994
DOI 10.1177/088307389400900412
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathologic features of Schilder's disease in a 17-year-old girl are presented and compared to 11 well-documented cases reported since 1912. The evolution of knowledge about Schilder's disease and the confusion in nomenclature are reviewed. Signs and symptoms in this case and others reported in the literature are nonspecific and may mimic mass lesions. Neuroimaging studies also may mimic brain tumor or abscess; however, the absence of significant edema, the irregular and incomplete ring enhancement, the discrepancy between size of the lesions and the associated mass effect, and the absence of other lesions elsewhere in the brain may help differentiate Schilder's disease from neoplasm, infection, and other demyelinating lesions. Although frozen sections of these lesions are often interpreted as astrocytoma, the inflammatory, primarily histiocytic, nature of Schilder's disease is more easily recognized in paraffin-embedded material. Unique features of this case include multiple unilateral lesions and the cyst-like degeneration present in both lesions. Multiple lesions in Schilder's disease are characteristically bilateral. The examination of aspirated fluid is the first such report in Schilder's disease. The limitation of multiple lesions in our case to one hemisphere calls for reexamination of the restrictive 1985 criteria of Poser for the diagnosis of Schilder's disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,908,488
of 26,402,731 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Neurology
#692
of 2,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,321
of 20,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Neurology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,402,731 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them