↓ Skip to main content

Multivariate assessment of site of lingual nerve

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multivariate assessment of site of lingual nerve
Published in
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.01.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

G.J. Dias, R.K. de Silva, T. Shah, E. Sim, N. Song, S. Colombage, J. Cornwall

Abstract

Injury to the lingual nerve can cause debilitating symptoms. The nerve lies in the retromolar region and its anatomical site can vary within patients and according to sex, age, and dentate status. To our knowledge, no previous studies have recorded its course from multiple bony landmarks and examined the association between age, dentate status, and sex, in the same sample. We dissected 30 white cadavers and took primary and secondary reference points from the internal oblique ridge. We measured the distance to the lingual nerve in sagittal, vertical, and horizontal planes, and recorded the position where the nerve was closest to the lingual plate. We dissected 46 hemimandibles (23 male, mean age 79 years, range 52-100) of which 26 were from the left side. Mean (SD) sagittal, vertical, and horizontal distances from the primary reference point were 9.29 (3.41)mm, 9.15 (3.87)mm, and 0.57 (0.56)mm, respectively. Mean (SD) vertical and horizontal distances from the secondary point were 7.79 (5.45) mm and 0.59 (0.64)mm, respectively. The proximity of the nerve to the lingual plate varied widely (range -13.00 to 15.17mm from the primary reference point). Dentate status was significant for the sagittal measurement from the primary point, and the vertical measurement from the secondary point. Differences in age, sex, or site of the contralateral nerve were not significant (n=16 pairs). Our findings suggest that the site of the nerve is consistent between and within subjects for sex and age, but not for dentate status. The association between the nerve and the lingual plate varied, which suggests that care must be taken when operating in the area.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 52%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2015.
All research outputs
#27,726,607
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
#1,280
of 1,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,433
of 409,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,797 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.