Batten disease, the juvenile form of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, is a prevalent neuron degenerative disorder of childhood. A 1.02-kb genomic deletion in the Batten disease gene CLN3 has been determined to be a common mutation. We developed a PCR method to screen for this deletion and tested 43 Batten disease probands. We found 36% (31/86) of Batten disease chromosomes did not carry the 1.02-kb deletion. Of the three heterozygotes for the 1.02-kb deletion, a novel G-to-A missense mutation at nucleotide 1020 of the CLN3 cDNA sequence was found on two of the non-1.02-kb deletion chromosomes. The missense mutation resulted in a substitution of glutamic acid (E) by lysine (K) at position 295 (E295 K). The E295 K mutation causes a change in predicted local protein conformation. This glutamic acid is a highly conserved acidic amino acid, being present in human, mouse, dog and yeast, which suggests it may play an important role in the function of the Batten disease protein.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
6%
Computer Science
1
6%
Other
1
6%
Unknown
1
6%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,014
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,753
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
