↓ Skip to main content

RUNNING INTERFERENCE: Prospects and Obstacles to Using Small Interfering RNAs as Small Molecule Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RUNNING INTERFERENCE: Prospects and Obstacles to Using Small Interfering RNAs as Small Molecule Drugs
Published in
Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, August 2006
DOI 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095848
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) is a well-conserved, ubiquitous, endogenous mechanism that uses small noncoding RNAs to silence gene expression. The endogenous small RNAs, called microRNAs, are processed from hairpin precursors and regulate important genes involved in cell death, differentiation, and development. RNAi also protects the genome from invading genetic elements, encoded by transposons and viruses. When small double-stranded RNAs, called small interfering (si)RNAs, are introduced into cells, they bind to the endogenous RNAi machinery to disrupt the expression of mRNAs containing complementary sequences with high specificity. Any disease-causing gene and any cell type or tissue can potentially be targeted. This technique has been rapidly utilized for gene-function analysis and drug-target discovery and validation. Harnessing RNAi also holds great promise for therapy, although introducing siRNAs into cells in vivo remains an important obstacle. Pilot siRNA clinical studies began just three years after the discovery that RNAi works in mammalian cells. This review discusses recent progress and obstacles to using siRNAs as small molecule drugs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Denmark 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 107 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Chemistry 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,140,738
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
#142
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,667
of 129,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.