↓ Skip to main content

Relevance of the ability of fructose 1,6-bis(phosphate) to sequester ferrous but not ferric ions

Overview of attention for article published in Carbohydrate Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relevance of the ability of fructose 1,6-bis(phosphate) to sequester ferrous but not ferric ions
Published in
Carbohydrate Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.carres.2010.12.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandar Bajić, Joanna Zakrzewska, Dejan Godjevac, Pavle Andjus, David R. Jones, Mihajlo Spasić, Ivan Spasojević

Abstract

The cytoprotective activity of F16BP has been documented in severe conditions such as convulsions, reperfusion injury, septic shock, diabetic complications, hypothermia-induced injury, UV-provoked skin damage and in other processes including apoptosis and excitotoxicity. F16BP shows very efficient cytoprotective activity in astroglial cells exposed to H(2)O(2)-provoked oxidative stress and during neuronal injury caused by hypoxic conditions. As most of the aforementioned processes involve iron activity-related conditions, we investigated the ferric and ferrous iron binding properties of F16BP under physiological conditions using (31)P NMR and EPR spectroscopy. Our results indicate that cytoprotective F16BP activity is predominantly based on ferrous iron sequestration. (31)P NMR spectroscopy of F16BP employing paramagnetic properties of iron clearly showed that F16BP forms stabile complexes with Fe(2+) which was verified by EPR of another divalent cation-Mn(2+). On the other hand, F16BP does not sequester ferric iron nor does it increase its redox activity as shown by (31)P NMR and EPR spin-trapping. Therefore, F16BP may be beneficial in neurodegenerative and other conditions that are characterised by ferric iron stores and deposits.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Serbia 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Carbohydrate Research
#1,388
of 5,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,697
of 190,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbohydrate Research
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.