Although sports participation and heavy physical work can contribute to rotator cuff tears, many patients expect to return to these activities after surgery; however, irreparable rotator cuff tears can preclude this outcome. A new surgical treatment-arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR)-restores shoulder stability and muscle balance in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears; consequently, it improves shoulder function and relieves pain.
To evaluate the rates of return to sports and physical work among patients treated with arthroscopic SCR.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
From 2007 to 2014, we performed arthroscopic SCR in 105 patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, 5 of whom were lost to follow-up. Consequently, 100 patients (mean age, 66.9 years; range, 43-82 years) were enrolled in the study. Before surgery, 26 patients had participated in sports (2 competitive, 24 recreational), and 34 patients had physical work. Rates of return to sports and physical work, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, active shoulder range of motion, and rate of graft tear were evaluated. The mean time to final follow-up was 48 months (range, 24-88 months).
All 26 patients who played sports before their injuries returned fully to them. In addition, 32 patients returned fully to their previous physical work, whereas the 2 remaining patients returned with reduced hours and workloads. As compared with the nonsports group, the sports group had significantly higher postoperative active elevation (160° ± 32° vs 146° ± 39°; P = .04) and higher postoperative ASES scores (97 ± 7 vs 91 ± 12; P = .02). The shoulder range of motion and ASES scores before and after surgery did not differ significantly between the physical and nonphysical work groups ( P = .11-.99). The rate of graft tear did not differ between the sports group (4%) and nonsports group (5%) ( P = .75) and between the physical work group (6%) and nonphysical work group (5%) ( P = .77).
Arthroscopic SCR restored shoulder function and resulted in high rates of return to recreational sports and physical work.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,840,796
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#4,222
of 5,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,457
of 331,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#79
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
