↓ Skip to main content

An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova
Published in
Nature, May 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature06997
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Massive stars end their short lives in spectacular explosions--supernovae--that synthesize new elements and drive galaxy evolution. Historically, supernovae were discovered mainly through their 'delayed' optical light (some days after the burst of neutrinos that marks the actual event), preventing observations in the first moments following the explosion. As a result, the progenitors of some supernovae and the events leading up to their violent demise remain intensely debated. Here we report the serendipitous discovery of a supernova at the time of the explosion, marked by an extremely luminous X-ray outburst. We attribute the outburst to the 'break-out' of the supernova shock wave from the progenitor star, and show that the inferred rate of such events agrees with that of all core-collapse supernovae. We predict that future wide-field X-ray surveys will catch each year hundreds of supernovae in the act of exploding.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 94 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Master 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 74 73%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2025.
All research outputs
#3,210,928
of 31,814,824 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#54,492
of 112,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,268
of 118,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#192
of 579 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,814,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 579 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.