↓ Skip to main content

Can Suillus granulatus (L.) Roussel be classified as a functional food?

Overview of attention for article published in Food & Function, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can Suillus granulatus (L.) Roussel be classified as a functional food?
Published in
Food & Function, January 2014
DOI 10.1039/c4fo00619d
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filipa S. Reis, Dejan Stojković, Lillian Barros, Jasmina Glamočlija, Ana Ćirić, Marina Soković, Anabela Martins, M. Helena Vasconcelos, Patricia Morales, Isabel C. F. R. Ferreira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 29%
Chemistry 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Food & Function
#1,438
of 4,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,880
of 322,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food & Function
#62
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.