David C Wilbur, Kalil Madi, Robert B Colvin, Lyn M Duncan, William C Faquin, Judith A Ferry, Matthew P Frosch, Stuart L Houser, Richard L Kradin, Gregory Y Lauwers, David N Louis, Eugene J Mark, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Joseph Misdraji, Gunnlauger P Nielsen, Martha B Pitman, Andrew E Rosenberg, R Neal Smith, Aliyah R Sohani, James R Stone, Rosemary H Tambouret, Chin-Lee Wu, Robert H Young, Artur Zembowicz, Wolfgang Klietmann
Abstract
-Whole-slide imaging technology offers promise for rapid, Internet-based telepathology consultations between institutions. Before implementation, technical issues, pathologist adaptability, and morphologic pitfalls must be well characterized.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Login
to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#1,320
of 2,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,332
of 165,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
