↓ Skip to main content

Progression of Mass Effect After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Progression of Mass Effect After Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Published in
Stroke, June 1999
DOI 10.1161/01.str.30.6.1167
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While the evolution of mass effect after cerebral infarction is well characterized, similar data regarding intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are scant. Our goal was to determine the time course and cause for progression of mass effect after ICH.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 132 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 41%
Neuroscience 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 41 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2026.
All research outputs
#4,792,185
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#5,057
of 15,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,366
of 49,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.