↓ Skip to main content

Scleritis and episcleritis.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Ophthalmology, March 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Scleritis and episcleritis.
Published in
British Journal of Ophthalmology, March 1976
DOI 10.1136/bjo.60.3.163
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The data from 159 patients (217 eyes) with episscleritis and 207 patients (301 eyes) with scleritis have been investigated in detail and the results analysed with the help of a computer. Of these patients, 91 per cent were followed-up during a period of one to eight years. A new classification is presented which is as follows: Episcleritis (217 eyes) Simple episcleritis (170 eyes) Nodular episcleritis (47 eyes) Scleritis (301 eyes) Diffuse anterior scleritis (119 eyes) Nodular anterior scleritis (134 eyes) Necrotizing scleritis (42 eyes). Of these, 13 were regarded as scleromalacia perforans. Posterior scleritis (6 eyes) The diagnosis is based on an exact clinical examination which is fully described. Episcleritis has been shown to be a benign recurring condition, a mild keratitis being the only occasional complication. Episcleritis does not progress to scleritis, except in the case of herpes zoster which sometimes starts as an episcleritis with the vesicular stage of the eruption, to reappear three months later as a scleritis in the same site. No clear conclusions could be drawn as to the aetiology of episcleritis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 43 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 40%
Unspecified 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 46 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2025.
All research outputs
#7,600,801
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#1,628
of 7,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#896
of 6,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.