The solution structure of the Cu(I) form of the rusticyanin from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans has been calculated from a total of 1979 distance and dihedral angle constraints derived from 1H, 13C and 15N NMR spectra. The structures reveal two beta-sheets, one of six strands and one of seven strands that are tightly packed in a beta-barrel or beta-sandwich arrangement, and a short helix that extends on the outside of one of the sheets to form a second hydrophobic core. The copper coordination sphere is composed of the standard type I ligands (His2CysMet) in a distorted tetrahedral arrangement. The copper-binding site is located within a hydrophobic region at one end of the molecule, surrounded by a number of aromatic rings and hydrophobic residues. This configuration probably contributes to the acid stability of the copper site, since close association of the aromatic rings with the histidine ligands would sterically hinder their dissociation from the copper. An electrostatic analysis based on a comparison of the structures of rusticyanin and French bean plastocyanin shows that factors determining the high redox potential of rusticyanin include contributions from charged side-chains and from the disposition of backbone peptide dipoles, particularly in the 81 to 86 region of the sequence and the ligand cysteine residue. These interactions should also contribute to the acid stability by inhibiting protonation of His143.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#9,515,649
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#5,109
of 12,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,496
of 30,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#28
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
