↓ Skip to main content

Registered Nurses’ communication about patients’ use of complementary therapies: A national survey

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Education & Counseling, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Registered Nurses’ communication about patients’ use of complementary therapies: A national survey
Published in
Patient Education & Counseling, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To identify communication patterns of Registered Nurses regarding patients' use of complementary therapies. A cross-sectional online survey conducted in 2017 recruited Australian Registered Nurses working in any area of nursing. Responses of 614 Registered Nurses were analysed. Patient-initiated discussion of complementary therapies were common for 77% of nurses; nurse-initiated discussions were perceived by 73% (sometimes/almost always/always). Nurses' personal use of complementary therapies predicted discussion with patients and education-based, oncology, or aged care/rehabilitation nurses were most likely to initiate dialogue. Many (55%) did not 'recommend' a particular therapy, although 12% 'almost always/always' did so. Four out of five nurses (84%) documented patients' use and communicated with medical/nursing colleagues about this use. Conversely, 61% 'never' or 'almost never' communicated with a complementary therapy practitioner. Nurses working in Australia often discuss complementary therapies, however they rarely specifically recommend their use. Their workplace environment and clinical context influenced nurses' willingness to communicate about complementary therapy use. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS EVIDENCE: suggests the need for policy development to promote communication between mainstream healthcare providers and complementary therapy practitioners to support the delivery of safe, high quality patient care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 23 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 29%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 26 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2026.
All research outputs
#21,003,232
of 34,040,673 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#3,001
of 4,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,438
of 375,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#27
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,040,673 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.