↓ Skip to main content

A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, December 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, December 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00173196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 109 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Professor 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 19%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#516
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,896
of 80,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.