↓ Skip to main content

シュリーレン法によるTBAB包接水和物の結晶成長と濃度場の同時計測

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
シュリーレン法によるTBAB包接水和物の結晶成長と濃度場の同時計測
Published in
Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), January 2018
DOI 10.1299/transjsme.17-00370
Authors

大徳 忠史, 鶴田 俊

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#19,820,130
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,590
of 451,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#8
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.