↓ Skip to main content

Metrics of lung tissue heterogeneity depend on BMI but not age

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Metrics of lung tissue heterogeneity depend on BMI but not age
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00510.2016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Altered parenchymal microstructure and complexity have been observed in older age. How to distinguish between healthy, expected changes and early signs of pathology remains poorly understood. An objective quantitative analysis of computed tomography (CT) imaging was conducted to compare mean lung density (MLD), tissue density distributions, and tissue heterogeneity in 16 subjects - 8 aged >60 years who were gender- and BMI-matched with 8 subjects aged <30 years. Subjects were never-smoking, with no prior respiratory disease, and no radiologically-identified abnormalities on CT. Volume-controlled breath-hold imaging acquired at 80% vital capacity ('end inspiration') and 55% vital capacity ('end expiration') were used for analysis. MLD was not different between the age groups at end inspiration (p=0.806), but was larger in the younger group at end expiration (0.26 {plus minus} 0.033 vs. 0.22 {plus minus} 0.026, p=0.008), as is expected due to increased air trapping in the older population. However, gravitational gradients of tissue density did not differ with age; the only difference in distribution of tissue density between the two age groups demonstrated a lower density in the apices of the older group at end expiration. The heterogeneity of the lung tissue assessed using two metrics showed significant differences between end inspiration and end expiration, no dependence on age, and a significant relationship with BMI at both lung volumes when heterogeneity was calculated using Quadtree Decomposition, but only at end expiration when using a Fractal Dimension.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 33 77%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 33 77%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,174,530
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#6,849
of 9,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,747
of 347,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#49
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.