| Title |
Transgenic Mosquitoes – Fact or Fiction?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Parasitology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pt.2018.02.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Technologies for controlling mosquito vectors based on genetic manipulation and the release of genetically modified mosquitoes (GMMs) are gaining ground. However, concrete epidemiological evidence of their effectiveness, sustainability, and impact on the environment and nontarget species is lacking; no reliable ecological evidence on the potential interactions among GMMs, target populations, and other mosquito species populations exists; and no GMM technology has yet been approved by the WHO Vector Control Advisory Group. Our opinion is that, although GMMs may be considered a promising control tool, more studies are needed to assess their true effectiveness, risks, and benefits. Overall, several lines of evidence must be provided before GMM-based control strategies can be used under the integrated vector management framework. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Ghana | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |