↓ Skip to main content

Transgenic Mosquitoes – Fact or Fiction?

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Parasitology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 2,357)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transgenic Mosquitoes – Fact or Fiction?
Published in
Trends in Parasitology, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.pt.2018.02.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Technologies for controlling mosquito vectors based on genetic manipulation and the release of genetically modified mosquitoes (GMMs) are gaining ground. However, concrete epidemiological evidence of their effectiveness, sustainability, and impact on the environment and nontarget species is lacking; no reliable ecological evidence on the potential interactions among GMMs, target populations, and other mosquito species populations exists; and no GMM technology has yet been approved by the WHO Vector Control Advisory Group. Our opinion is that, although GMMs may be considered a promising control tool, more studies are needed to assess their true effectiveness, risks, and benefits. Overall, several lines of evidence must be provided before GMM-based control strategies can be used under the integrated vector management framework.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 8%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 277. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#162,098
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Parasitology
#13
of 2,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,202
of 377,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Parasitology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.