↓ Skip to main content

A Direct Interaction with NEDD1 Regulates γ-Tubulin Recruitment to the Centrosome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Direct Interaction with NEDD1 Regulates γ-Tubulin Recruitment to the Centrosome
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009618
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The centrosome is the primary microtubule organizing centre of the cell. gamma-tubulin is a core component of the centrosome and is required for microtubule nucleation and centrosome function. The recruitment of gamma-tubulin to centrosomes is mediated by its interaction with NEDD1, a WD40-repeat containing protein. Here we demonstrate that NEDD1 is likely to be oligomeric in vivo and binds directly to gamma-tubulin through a small region of just 62 residues at the carboxyl-terminus of the protein. This carboxyl-terminal domain that binds gamma-tubulin has a helical structure and is a stable tetramer in solution. Mutation of residues in NEDD1 that disrupt binding to gamma-tubulin result in a mis-localization of gamma-tubulin away from the centrosome. Hence, this study defines the binding site on NEDD1 that is required for its interaction with gamma-tubulin, and shows that this interaction is required for the correct localization of gamma-tubulin.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,425,541
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#108,592
of 224,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,678
of 144,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#543
of 887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.