↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
32 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
675 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Activation of the IκB Kinase Complex by TRAF6 Requires a Dimeric Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme Complex and a Unique Polyubiquitin Chain
Published in
Cell, October 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00126-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

TRAF6 is a signal transducer in the NF-kappaB pathway that activates IkappaB kinase (IKK) in response to proinflammatory cytokines. We have purified a heterodimeric protein complex that links TRAF6 to IKK activation. Peptide mass fingerprinting analysis reveals that this complex is composed of the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme Ubc13 and the Ubc-like protein Uev1A. We find that TRAF6, a RING domain protein, functions together with Ubc13/Uev1A to catalyze the synthesis of unique polyubiquitin chains linked through lysine-63 (K63) of ubiquitin. Blockade of this polyubiquitin chain synthesis, but not inhibition of the proteasome, prevents the activation of IKK by TRAF6. These results unveil a new regulatory function for ubiquitin, in which IKK is activated through the assembly of K63-linked polyubiquitin chains.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 662 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 193 29%
Student > Master 93 14%
Researcher 73 11%
Student > Bachelor 70 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Other 80 12%
Unknown 124 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 222 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 169 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 43 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 6%
Chemistry 18 3%
Other 47 7%
Unknown 137 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2026.
All research outputs
#2,249,404
of 30,539,290 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#6,363
of 18,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,869
of 47,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#6
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,539,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.